Paradoxes and Possibilities of “Confucian Freedom”: From Yan Fu to Mou Zongsan

Philosophy East and West 66 (1):218-258 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ever since the seventeenth century, freedom had been defined as all great philosophy’s most private concern. Philosophy had an unexpressed mandate from the bourgeoisie to find transparent grounds for freedom. But that concern is antagonistic in itself.The normative ideal of freedom lies at the heart of the self-understanding of modern Western societies. The various dimensions of modern freedom are widely recognized as essential values; many or even most members of Western societies also assume the idea of freedom to be objectively valid. Also, according to a very influential philosophical theory, namely liberal..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dao de li xiang zhu yi di chong jian: Mou Zongsan xin ru xue lun zhu ji yao.Zongsan Mou & Jiadong Zheng - 1992 - Beijing: Zhongguo guang bo dian shi chu ban she. Edited by Jiadong Zheng.
The Confucian Conception of Freedom.Chenyang Li - 2014 - Philosophy East and West 64 (4):902-919.
Ben ti yu fang fa: cong Xiong Shili dao Mou Zongsan.Jiadong Zheng - 1992 - Shenyang Shi: Liaoning sheng xin hua shu dian fa xing.
Mou zongsan on confucian and Kant's ethics: A critical reflection.Wing-Cheuk Chan - 2011 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (s1):146-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
45 (#360,045)

6 months
11 (#264,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references