On Accelerations in Science Driven by Daring Ideas: Good Messages from Fallibilistic Rationalism

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40 (1):19-41 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first good message is to the effect that people possess reason as a source of intellectual insights, not available to the senses, as e.g. axioms of arithmetic. The awareness of this fact is called rationalism. Another good message is that reason can daringly quest for and gain new plausible insights. Those, if suitably checked and confirmed, can entail a revision of former results, also in mathematics, and - due to the greater efficiency of new ideas - accelerate science’s progress. The awareness that no insight is secured against revision, is called fallibilism. This modern fallibilistic rationalism, i.e. the belief in the attainability of inviolable truths of reason which would forever constitute the foundations of knowledge. Fallibilistic rationalism is based on the idea that any problem-solving consists in processing information. Its results vary with respect to informativeness and its reverse - certainty. It is up to science to look for highly informative solutions, in spite of their uncertainty, and then to make them more certain through testing against suitable evidence. To account for such cognitive processes, one resorts to the conceptual apparatus of logic, informatics, and cognitive science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism.Antoni Diller - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156.
Feyerabend and Popper on Theory Proliferation and Anomaly Import: On the Compatibility of Theoretical Pluralism and Critical Rationalism.Karim Bschir - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):24-55.
Between Chomskian rationalism and Popperian empiricism.Stephen P. Stich - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):329-47.
A critique of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge.Si Sun - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):115-130.
Popper and Hayek on Reason and Tradition.Jack Birner - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (3):263-281.
Critical Rationalism in the Test Tube?Nikos Psarros - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):297 - 305.
Beyond Cues and Political Elites: The Forgotten Zaller.Jeffrey Friedman - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (4):417-461.
The Paradoxes of Utopia A Study in Utopian Rationalism.Bertil Mårtensson - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (4):476-514.
Nature of methods in science: technology driven science versus science driven technology.Subhash C. Lakhotia - 2009 - Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 31 (12):1370-1371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-17

Downloads
19 (#803,690)

6 months
3 (#984,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Witold Marciszewski
Warsaw University

Citations of this work

Knowledge Routines, Threads and Network Dynamics.Anna Kawalec & Paweł Kawalec - 2022 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67 (1):247-268.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Systems of Logic Based on Ordinals.Andrzej Mostowski - 1939 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):128-129.

Add more references