Max Weber on Science, in the Context of Our Days Thinking

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 63 (8):56-71 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Max Weber analyzes the science of the Modern Period. The revolution in physics at the beginning of the 20th century, the creation of quantum mechanics bring to the fore another type of scientific thinking. It is important to note that past knowledge in this case is not refuted, not destroyed, it becomes marginal and enters into communication with its competitor. It is this type of communication with Weber’s philosophy of scientific thinking that helps us to understand its specificity. According to Weber, new knowledge is derived from the previous one, refuting its truth. On this basis, Weber writes that science is different from the art, where the created works retain their significance regardless of the time when they were created. For modern science the predecessor is necessary as another, without which not any communication is possible. Classical science, about which Weber writes, is necessary and continues to function. Satisfying the reemerging needs of society, it can detect previously hidden possibilities and, at the same time, encourage new scientific thinking to strengthen its position.The concept of revolution disappears gradually from the works on science. Instead, sociological concepts such as an innovation center or a technopark that combine simultaneously changes in the logic of knowledge and in the technical equipment of society are becoming popular. Logical and social characteristics of science are combined, the boundary between them becomes less noticeable. If in the era of classics the artificial world surrounding man was built on the basis of the laws of nature, now it is being created on the basis of the laws of thinking. For Weber, this world was silent and dead, this is what classical science testified to. Now the world around us is endowed with artificial intelligence, and we must be able to communicate with it. To understand Weber, it is necessary to establish contact with the world of classics, and not to try to destroy it and to declare it worthless.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Max Weber and the Iron Cage of Technology.Terry Maley - 2004 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 24 (1):69-86.
Webers idealtypus AlS methode zur bestimmung Des begriffsinhaltes theoretischer begriffe in den kulturwissenschaften.Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):275 - 296.
Max Weber on Science: Reception and Perspectives.Alexander Yu Antonovski & Raisa E. Barash - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (4):174-188.
A Dialogue of Social Philosophy with W. Whewell’s Logic of Science.L. A. Markova - 2019 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 12:26-43.
Science as a Vocation. Hermeneutics and Reflection.Alexey A. Golovin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):190-200.
Max Weber's Concept of "Event", and the Logical Categories of a "Science of Chaos" [Spanish].Luca Mori - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 18:100-123.
Weber: political writings.Max Weber - 1994 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Lassman & Ronald Speirs.
Depth and Surface. Max Weber, Leo Strauss, and the Practical Nature of Political Philosophy.Luciano Nosetto - 2015 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 4 (7):133-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-11

Downloads
13 (#1,040,625)

6 months
6 (#529,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Social Epistemology.Steve Fuller - 1990 - Erkenntnis 33 (1):131-135.
Physics in My Generation.Max Born - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (42):157-159.
The Social Epistemologies of Software.David M. Berry - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):379-398.
Social Еpistemology.Ilya Kasavin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:113-121.

Add more references