Judgement aggregation in scientific collaborations: The case for waiving expertise

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84:66-74 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics.Daniele Porello - 2017 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 27 (1-2):106-139.
Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation.Marc Pauly & Martin van Hees - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (6):569 - 585.
Aggregation and Numbers.Iawo Hirose - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):62-79.
Aggregation and numbers.Iwao Hirose - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):62-79.
On the Accuracy of Group Credences.Richard Pettigrew - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 6.
Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2007 - Social Choice and Welfare 29 (1):19-33.
Waiving consent in emergencies helps patients.[author unknown] - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (1):55-55.
Rational aggregation.Bruce Chapman - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):337-354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-09

Downloads
30 (#544,059)

6 months
6 (#566,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Nguyen
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Experts: Which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
The Uniqueness Thesis.Matthew Kopec & Michael G. Titelbaum - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (4):189-200.
Social knowing: The social sense of 'scientific knowledge'.Alexander Bird - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):23-56.

View all 19 references / Add more references