Intervening variable or hypothetical construct?

Psychological Review 58 (4):235-247 (1951)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0054854

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Empathy as a special case of emotional mediation of social behavior.Filippo Aureli & Colleen M. Schaffner - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):23-24.
E. C. Tolman and the intervening variable: A study in the epistemological history of psychology.Ron Amundson - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (2):268-282.
Hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.Arthur Ginsberg - 1954 - Psychological Review 61 (2):119-131.
On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.Kenneth MacCorquodale & Paul E. Meehl - 1948 - Psychological Review 55 (2):95-107.
Man's Will: The Intervening Variable in Moral Education.Cliff Schimmels & Gary Andres - 1977 - Journal of Thought 12 (1):9-13.
Dominance: An intervening variable.Robert A. Hinde & Saroj Datta - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):442-442.
What is a gene?—Revisited.Raphael Falk - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (4):396-406.
The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments.Susanne Bobzien - 1997 - Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.
Two experiments are reported in which the decline or decrement in the magnitude of the Brentano Müller-Lyer illusion was measured. Observers made a pre-test judgment and, after a variable intervening time period, a post-test judgment of illusion magnitude. In experiment 1, the intervening time periods were 1, 2, and 3 min during which time the independent groups of observers allocated to each of the three time periods either systematically scanned the Brentano figure (inspection conditions) or waited until the intervening period had elapsed (no-inspection conditions). Experiment 2, which included an additional 5 min intervening time period, evaluated a response-bias explanation for the results of the inspection conditions of experiment 1. Taken together, the findings of the two experiments indicate that sheer inspection of the Brentano figure produces illusion decrement. However, illusion decrement was independent of the duration of the inspection period, with equivalent amounts of dec. [REVIEW]J. Predebon - 1998 - Perception 27:183-192.
Privileged Access and a Hypothetical Construct Theory of Mental States.Peter Neely Mccormick - 1973 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Relationships Among Interpersonal Values, Social Behavior, Leadership Style, and Cultural Adaptability.Helen K. Mireles - 2004 - Dissertation, Our Lady of the Lake University
Forgiveness by God and Human Forgivingness: The Centrality of the Religiosity Makes the Difference.S. Huber, M. Allemand & O. W. Huber - 2011 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 33 (1):115-134.
The Formalist Picture of Cognition. Towards a Total Demystification.Karlis Podnieks - manuscript
Relativistic hidden variable theories?Frank Arntzenius - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (2):207 - 231.
On behaviorism, theories, and hypothetical constructs.J. Moore - 1998 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 19 (2):215-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
8 (#1,322,828)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Definition and reduction.Edward H. Madden - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (4):390-405.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references