Is the problem of conflicting intentions a genuine problem? Some remarks on Gómez-torrente´s “roads to reference”

Manuscrito 43 (4):49-58 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this brief discussion piece I try to offer some considerations in favor of the so-called Simple Intention Theory of demonstratives, which is rejected by Gómez-Torrente. I try to show that the main argument offered against the Simple Intention Theory appears to be based on false data.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

There is a problem of change.Michael J. Raven - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (1):23-35.
Constructivism and the Problem of Normative Indeterminacy.Yair Levy - 2019 - Journal of Value Inquiry 53 (2):243-253.
Epistemicist Models: Comments on Gómez‐Torrente and Graff.Timothy Williamson - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):143-150.
Epistemicist models: Comments on gómez-torrente and Graff.Timothy Williamson - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):143-150.
Pure Quotation Is Demonstrative Reference.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy 115 (7):361-381.
The problem of logical constants.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Rule-Following Made Easy.Sven Bernecker - 2004 - In Winfried Löffler & Paul Weingartner (eds.), Knowledge and Belief. öbv-hpt. pp. 63-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-10

Downloads
14 (#992,444)

6 months
6 (#524,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?