Boolean Conservative Extension Results for some Modal Relevant Logics

Australasian Journal of Logic 8 (5):31-49 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper shows that a collection of modal relevant logics are conservatively extended by the addition of Boolean negation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classically complete modal relevant logics.Edwin D. Mares - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):165-177.
CE is not a conservative extension of E.Edwin D. Mares - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):263-275.
Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.
A1 is not a conservative extension of s4 but of S.Michiro Kondo - 1989 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (3):321 - 323.
Independent propositional modal logics.S. K. Thomason - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (2-3):143 - 144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
25 (#638,031)

6 months
8 (#372,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Koji Tanaka
Australian National University
Edwin Mares
Victoria University of Wellington

Citations of this work

Actual Issues for Relevant Logics.Shawn Standefer - 2020 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7.
Quantified Modal Relevant Logics.Nicholas Ferenz - 2023 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):210-240.
Neighbourhood Semantics for Modal Relevant Logics.Nicholas Ferenz & Andrew Tedder - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (1):145-181.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.

Add more references