Torricelli's Infinitely Long Solid and Its Philosophical Reception in the Seventeenth Century

&
Isis 82 (1):50-70 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/355637

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Torricelli's Infinitely Long Solid and Its Philosophical Reception in the Seventeenth Century.Paolo Mancosu & Ezio Vailati - 1991 - Isis 82:50-70.
Natural philosophy in the graduation theses of the Scottish universities in the first half of the seventeenth century.Giovanni Gellera - unknown
Torricelli's correspondence on ballistics.Michael Segre - 1983 - Annals of Science 40 (5):489-499.
Philosophy of mathematics and mathematical practice in the seventeenth century.Paolo Mancosu (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. [REVIEW]Douglas Jesseph - 1998 - Philosophical Review 107 (1):146-148.
Review: L. Henkin, Some Remarks on Infinitely Long Formulas; Carol R. Karp, Independence Proofs in Predicate Logic with Infinitely Long Expressions. [REVIEW]Thomas Frayne - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):96-97.
F. M. van Helmont: His philosophical connections and the reception of his later cabbalistic philosophy.Stuart Brown - 1997 - In M. A. Stewart (ed.), Studies in Seventeenth-Century European Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 97--116.
From Indivisibles to Infinitesimals: Studies on Seventeenth-Century Mathematizations of Infinitely Small Quantities. Antoni Malet.Amir Alexander - 1998 - Isis 89 (1):131-132.
Review of Carla Rita Palmerino (ed.), J.m.M.h. Thijssen (ed.), The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe. [REVIEW]Joseph C. Pitt - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (7).
Radical mathematical Thomism: beings of reason and divine decrees in Torricelli’s philosophy of mathematics.Paolo Palmieri - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):131-142.
From Indivisibles to Infinitesimals: Studies on Seventeenth-Century Mathematizations of Infinitely Small Quantities by Antoni Malet. [REVIEW]Amir Alexander - 1998 - Isis 89:131-132.
Solution to the long-standing puzzle of Huygens’ “anomalous suspension”.Michael Nauenberg - 2015 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 69 (3):327-341.
Generalized algebras of Post and their applications to infinitely many-valued logics with infinitely long formulas.Nguen Cat-ho - 1972 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 1 (1):4-12.
The reception of cartesianism.John Henry - 2013 - In Peter R. Anstey (ed.), The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 116.
Review: H. Jerome Keisler, J. W. Addison, Leon Henkin, Alfred Tarski, Finite Approximations of Infinitely Long Formulas; H. Jerome Keisler, Some Applications of Infinitely Long Formulas. [REVIEW]Carol Karp - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (1):129-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
22 (#711,593)

6 months
4 (#796,002)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Paolo Mancosu
University of California, Berkeley
Ezio Vailati
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Citations of this work

Distinguiendo diagramas infinitos.José Seoane - 2018 - Metatheoria – Revista de Filosofía E Historia de la Ciencia 9:1--11.
Mathematik und Religion in der frühen Neuzeit.Herbert Breger - 1995 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 18 (3):151-160.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references