Aristotle, Dispositions and Occult Powers

Review of Metaphysics 18 (4):678 - 689 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The doctrine which needs clarification may be put several ways: "Modern" science, unlike Aristotelian science, does not appeal to "occult powers"; or, the doctrine of final causes is occult and unscientific; or, while modern science, in establishing laws, "explains," Aristotelian science does not. More narrowly, two separate though related claims are being made: Aristotelian science is occult. This charge is leveled at final causes and Aristotelian "powers." Aristotelian science does not explain. This charge is typified by Moliere's famous jibe at "dormitive power." In order to clear away the truths from the half-truths, I will defend the following points

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causation, Laws and Dispositions.Andreas Hüttemann - 2007 - In Max Kistler & Bruno Gnassounou (eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers. Ashgate.
Recent Work on Dispositions.Troy Cross - 2012 - Analysis 72 (1):115-124.
Occult Powers and Hypotheses. [REVIEW]Richard A. Watson - 1992 - International Studies in Philosophy 24 (3):131-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
43 (#371,989)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references