A biosemiotics perspective on dogs’ interaction with interfaces

Interaction Studies 24 (2):201-224 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Understanding how animals might make sense of the interfaces they interact with is important to inform the design of animal-centered interactions. In this regard, biosemiotics provides a useful lens through which to examine animals’ interactions with interfaces and the sensemaking mechanisms that might underpin such interactions. This paper leverages Uexküll’s Umwelt theory, Peirce’s logic of sign relations and Gibson’s theory of affordances to analyze examples of dogs’ interactions with interfaces, particularly the role of the semiotic mechanisms of indexicality and isomorphism. Based on these analyses, the paper derives design implications, and proposes a semiotic framework to support the analysis and design of canine-centered interactions. The framework could be subsequently extended to support the analysis and design of interactive systems for other species.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What's one more?Margaret Poynter - 1985 - New York: Atheneum. Edited by Elise Primavera.
In Search of Pedigrees: Why Do We Harm the Dogs We Love?Randall Lockwood - 2019 - Journal of Animal Ethics 9 (2):220-225.
My Dog, My Self; or Dogs-r-us.Pete Porter - 2010 - Society and Animals 18 (3):319.
Logic for dogs.Andrew Aberdein - 2008 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), What Philosophy Can Tell You About Your Dog. Open Court. pp. 167-181.
With Dogs at the Edge of Life.Colin Dayan - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
Regan’s Lifeboat Case and the Additive Assumption.Daniel Kary - 2020 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33 (1):127-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-04

Downloads
11 (#1,142,538)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 435 - 450.
Abduction, Reason, and Science.L. Magnani - 2001 - Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Cumulative Record.B. F. Skinner - 1963 - British Journal of Educational Studies 11 (2):209-210.
The Sign and Its Masters.Thomas A. Sebeok - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):216-218.

Add more references