Wittgensteinian themes: essays, 1978-1989

Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Edited by G. H. von Wright (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At a time when interest in the Wittgensteinian tradition has quickened, this volume brings together fourteen essays by Norman Malcolm, a prominent philosopher ...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1996

Call number

B3376.W564.M25 1995

ISBN(s)

0801430429   0801483816
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In Search of Meaning: Ludwig Wittgenstein on Ethics, Mysticism and Religion.Ulrich Arnswald (ed.) - 2009 - Karlsruhe: Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe.
Wittgensteinian themes: essays in honour of David Pears.David Pears, David Charles & William Child (eds.) - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Review: The New Wittgenstein. [REVIEW]D. McManus - 2005 - Mind 114 (453):129-137.
Hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action, and interpretation.Paul Ricœur - 1981 - Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme. Edited by John B. Thompson.
Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes.Graham Alan John Rogers & Alan Ryan (eds.) - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Pathmarks.Martin Heidegger (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Essays for P. M. S. Hacker.Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
72 (#229,949)

6 months
1 (#1,478,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What Moore’s Paradox Is About.Claudio de Almeida - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):33-58.
What Moore's Paradox Is About.Claudio Almeida - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):33 - 58.
Weismann, Wittgenstein and the homunculus fallacy.Harry Smit - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (3):263-271.
Weismann, Wittgenstein and the homunculus fallacy.Harry Smit - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (3):263-271.
Wherefore the Failure of Private Ostension?George Wrisley - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):483 - 498.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references