The Burden and Order of Proof in WTO Claims: Evolving Issues

International Journal of Law and Management 59 (6):1220-1235 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is one of the best dispute settlement mechanisms in the world. Under WTO rules, aggrieved parties must establish a “prima facie” case before the panel can call on the offending party to respond to the claims. The objective of the present study is to critically evaluate the application of the concept of burden of proof underWTOdispute settlement mechanism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Burden of Proof.James Cargile - 1997 - Philosophy 72 (279):59 - 83.
Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews.Corina Andone - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (1):74-87.
Burden of Proof Rules in Social Criticism.Juha Räikkä - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):463-477.
Burden of proof.DouglasN Walton - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):233-254.
The Contents and Features of Dispute Settlement under the US – Jordan FTA: An Appraisal.Bashar H. Malkawi - 2018 - Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 15 (2):176-189.
Beweislastverteilung und Intuitionen in philosophischen Diskursen.Thorsten Sander - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (1):69-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-02

Downloads
505 (#37,076)

6 months
113 (#36,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bashar H. Malkawi
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references