The IPBES Conceptual Framework: An Unhelpful Start

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):327-347 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services have recently launched themselves as the UN-sanctioned instrument for conserving nature. They seek to establish themselves as the authority in this field alongside the well-known Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in climate science. Quickly following or even before recent publication of their conceptual framework in two biology journals, they were already underway building upon it. This headlong push, we believe, is ill advised. We show how the framework is unsound as a foundation for further work—in a number of ways and perhaps even by its authors’ own lights. It is therefore urgent that the IPBES thoroughly and thoughtfully reconsider their framework before too much effort is wasted

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Locality/Separability: Is This Necessarily a Useful Distinction?James T. Cushing - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:107 - 116.
A New Framework for Comparative Study of Philosophy.Desheng Zong - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):445-459.
Events and their reality.Uwe Meixner - 1994 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 2 (5):23-33.
Sémiotické funkce konceptuálního rámce.Ladislav Tondl - 2005 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 12 (3):278-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-01

Downloads
34 (#472,961)

6 months
11 (#245,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?