How Can History of Science Matter to Scientists?

Isis 99 (2):341-349 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

History of science has developed into a methodologically diverse discipline, adding greatly to our understanding of the interplay between science, society, and culture. Along the way, one original impetus for the then newly emerging discipline—what George Sarton called the perspective “from the point of view of the scientist”—dropped out of fashion. This essay shows, by means of several examples, that reclaiming this interaction between science and history of science yields interesting perspectives and new insights for both science and history of science. The authors consequently suggest that historians of science also adopt this perspective as part of their methodological repertoire

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rational Reconstruction Reconsidered.Bence Nanay - 2010 - The Monist 93 (4):598-617.
The Role of the Matthew Effect in Science.Michael Strevens - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):159-170.
The Role of History in Science.Richard Creath - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (2):207 - 214.
Civil Scientists: Dutch Scientists between 1750 and 1875.Ad Maas - 2010 - History of Science 48 (1):75-103.
Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
57 (#287,795)

6 months
18 (#152,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?