A note on J. L. Austin and the drama

Philosophy 74 (1):119-121 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A play's text is nearly all talk, and in the performance of a play the physical activity is sparse and exceedingly limited. Used of a play, the term ‘action’ does not mean what it normally means. Its true meaning is illuminated by reference to J. L. Austin and his doctrine of speech-acts. Dramatic action is, for the most part, speech-action. And a skilful manipulation of speech-acts enables the gifted dramatist not only to tell a story but to communicate what is going on below the surface.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Freedom of communicative action.Lawrence B. Solum - 1989 - Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
Speech acts without propositions?Marina Sbisà - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):155-178.
How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Knowledge Guaranteed.John Turri - 2011 - Noûs 47 (3):602-612.
Elements of Speech Act Theory in the Work of Thomas Reid.Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):47 - 66.
What can Austin tell us about truth?Jeffrey Hershfield - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):220-228.
Speech and the social contract.Roy Turner - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):43 – 53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#256,247)

6 months
8 (#359,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references