Theorizing Agency and Domination through a Critical Realist Perspective on Gender Positionality

Journal of Critical Realism 15 (5):440-457 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminist theory continues to struggle with the recurrence of the twin-problem of agency and domination: how can gender be conceptualized as a structure of domination that constitutes and restricts agency, without obscuring the possibilities for change and transformation through agency? To address this problem, I draw on the concept of agency developed by Margaret Archer. By elaborating on her notion of the structural shaping of the situation and combining it with elements of Thomas Wartenberg's work, in this article I outline a concept of domination from a broadly critical realist perspective. I thus demonstrate how gender can be understood as a social structure that is constitutive of relations of domination. This framework draws attention to the limitations of ‘undoing’ gender on an interactionist micro level as well as to the concrete possibilities for agency due to situational contradictions and emergent subjective powers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-domination's role in the theorizing of global justice.Mira Bachvarova - 2013 - Journal of Global Ethics 9 (2):173 - 185.
Longitudinal case research - A critical realist perspective.Philip J. Dobson - 2001 - Systemic Practice and Action Research 14 (3):283-296.
Gender, agency, and coercion.Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips & Kalpana Wilson (eds.) - 2013 - New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The gender selectivities of the state: a critical realist analysis.Bob Jessop - 2004 - Journal of Critical Realism 3 (2):207-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-14

Downloads
16 (#932,051)

6 months
5 (#707,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?