How applied mathematics became pure

Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):16-41 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My goal here is to explore the relationship between pure and applied mathematics and then, eventually, to draw a few morals for both. In particular, I hope to show that this relationship has not been static, that the historical rise of pure mathematics has coincided with a gradual shift in our understanding of how mathematics works in application to the world. In some circles today, it is held that historical developments of this sort simply represent changes in fashion, or in social arrangements, governments, power structures, or some such thing, but I resist the full force of this way of thinking, clinging to the old school notion that we have gradually learned more about the world over time, that our opinions on these matters have improved, and that seeing how we reached the point we now occupy may help us avoid falling back into old philosophies that are now no longer viable. In that spirit, it seems to me that once we focus on the general question of how mathematics relates to science, one observation is immediate: the march of the centuries has produced an amusing reversal of philosophical fortunes. Let me begin there. In the beginning, that is, in Plato, mathematical knowledge was sharply distinguished from ordinary perceptual belief about the world. According to Plato’s metaphysics, mathematics is the study of eternal and unchanging abstract Forms,1 while science is uncertain and changeable opinion about the world of mere becoming. Indeed, in Plato’s lights, of the two, only mathematics deserves to be called ‘knowledge’ at all! Of course if sense perception cannot give us knowledge, if mathematics is not about perceivable things, then Plato owes us an account of how we ordinary humans achieve this wonderful insight into the properties of the abstract world of Forms. Plato’s answer is that we do not actually acquire mathematical knowledge at all; rather, we recollect it from a time before birth, when our souls, unencumbered by physical bodies, were free to commune with the Forms, and not just the mathematical ones, either – also Truth, Beauty, Justice, the Good, and so on.2 Whatever appeal this position may have held for the ancient Greeks, it will not begin to satisfy a contemporary, scientifically minded philosopher..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Husserlian Perspective on Empirical Mathematics in Aristotle.Jean De Groot - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:91-99.
Apriority and applied mathematics.Robert A. Holland - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):349 - 370.
Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.Eugene Wigner - 1960 - Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:1-14.
Realism in mathematics.Penelope Maddy - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Prress.
On the Role of Constructivism in Mathematical Epistemology.A. Quale - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):104-111.
Why is there Philosophy of Mathematics AT ALL?Ian Hacking - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):1-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
180 (#108,997)

6 months
18 (#141,331)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Penelope J. Maddy
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

Is Mathematics Unreasonably Effective?Daniel Waxman - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (1):83-99.
Frege, Dedekind, and the Origins of Logicism.Erich H. Reck - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):242-265.
Maddy On The Multiverse.Claudio Ternullo - 2019 - In Deniz Sarikaya, Deborah Kant & Stefania Centrone (eds.), Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics. Berlin: Springer Verlag. pp. 43-78.
A second philosophy of arithmetic.Penelope Maddy - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):1-28.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The aim and structure of physical theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton,: Princeton University Press.
Mathematical truth.Paul Benacerraf - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
Mathematics as a science of patterns.Michael David Resnik - 1997 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Naturalism in mathematics.Penelope Maddy - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references