Governing with Ignorance: Understanding the Australian Food Regulator’s Response to Nano Food

NanoEthics 12 (1):27-38 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines regulatory responses to the presence of previously undetected and unlabelled nanoparticles in the Australian food system. Until 2015, the Australian regulatory body Food Standards Australia New Zealand denied that nanoparticles were present in Australian food. However, and despite repeated claims from Australia’s food regulator, research commissioned by civil society group Friends of the Earth has demonstrated that nanoparticles are deliberately included as ingredients in an array of food available for sale in Australia. This paper critically examines how nanoparticles have come to be integrated into Australia’s food system under the radar of Australia’s food regulator. Our case study of FSANZ—including its responses to the civil society-led science that determined the existence of nanoparticles in Australian food—raises a number of important questions about the governance of risk in relation to emerging technologies such as nanotechnology. In this paper, we argue that FSANZ’ response to the presence of nanotechnology in Australia’s food system is an example of ‘governing with ignorance’. This is demonstrated via the denial and dismissal of science claims as a basis for limited regulatory intervention. FSANZ’ response intersects with the centrality of commercial interests in shaping science research and commercialisation, alongside the ‘hands off’ approach to regulation that is characteristic of neoliberal governance approaches. We conclude by arguing that in the current food governance framework, and alongside a paucity of impact science, civil society plays a vital role in attempts to democratise the Australian food system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just Food: Philosophy, Justice and Food.Jill Marie Dieterle (ed.) - 2015 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
The Metaphysics and Ethics of Food as Activity.Ileana F. Szymanski - 2014 - Radical Philosophy Review 17 (2):351-370.
Gender Norms and Food Behaviors.Alison Reiheld - 2012 - In Paul B. Thompson & David M. Kaplan (eds.), Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. New York: Springer Verlag.
Beyond Food/Sex.Elspeth Probyn - 1999 - Theory, Culture and Society 16 (2):215-228.
Food Sovereignty, Health Sovereignty, and Self-Organized Community Viability.Ian Werkheiser - 2014 - Interdisciplinary Environmental Review 15 (2/3):134-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
21 (#736,702)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Response to Article 309.Mark Booth - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):173-175.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance.Robert N. Proctor & Londa Schiebinger (eds.) - 2008 - Stanford University Press Stanford, California.
The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach.Garry C. Gray - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (3):629-634.
The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach.Garry C. Gray - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (3):629-634.

Add more references