- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Evaluating the Quality of Research Ethics Review and Oversight: A Systematic Analysis of Quality Assessment Instruments
AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (4):208-222 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Evaluating ethics oversight during assessment of research integrity.Alison Avenell, Mark Bolland & Andrew Grey - 2019 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1).
Moving Beyond Compliance: Measuring Ethical Quality to Enhance the Oversight of Human Subjects Research.Holly Taylor - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (5).
Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system.Kevin Fiscella, Jonathan N. Tobin, Jennifer K. Carroll, Hua He & Gbenga Ogedegbe - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):63.
Quality of ethical guidelines and ethical content in clinical guidelines: the example of end-of-life decision-making.D. Strech & J. Schildmann - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):390-396.
Assessing Quality and Evaluating Performance in Higher Education: Worlds Apart or Complementary Views?Cláudia S. Sarrico, Maria J. Rosa, Pedro N. Teixeira & Margarida F. Cardoso - 2010 - Minerva 48 (1):35-54.
Organizational assessment in general practice: a systematic review and implications for quality improvement.Melody Rhydderch, Adrian Edwards, Glyn Elwyn, Martin Marshall, Yvonne Engels, Pieter Van den Hombergh & Richard Grol - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (4):366-378.
Why Quality Is Addressed So Rarely in Clinical Ethics Consultation.George J. Agich - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):339.
The concept of quality in clinical research.Dorota Śwituła - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):147-156.
Ethics Consultation Quality Assessment Tool: A Novel Method for Assessing the Quality of Ethics Case Consultations Based on Written Records.Robert A. Pearlman, Mary Beth Foglia, Ellen Fox, Jennifer H. Cohen, Barbara L. Chanko & Kenneth A. Berkowitz - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):3-14.
Felicitometry: Measuring the 'quality' in quality of life.Charles Kowalski, Steven Pennell & Amiram Vinokur - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (6):307–313.
The Quality of Business Ethics Journals: An Assessment Based on Application.Holly H. Brower, Bruce R. Lewis & S. Douglas Beets - 2016 - Business and Society 55 (2):188-213.
Assessing the quality of colorectal cancer care: do we have appropriate quality measures? (A systematic review of literature).Meenal Patwardhan, Deborah A. Fisher, Christopher R. Mantyh, Douglas C. McCrory, Michael A. Morse, Robert G. Prosnitz, Kathryn Cline & Gregory P. Samsa - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (6):831-845.
Promoting High Quality Work: Obstacles and Opportunities. [REVIEW]David A. Spencer - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):583-597.
Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003. [REVIEW]B. K. Redman - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):153-156.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-08-22
Downloads
18 (#836,359)
6 months
6 (#529,161)
2020-08-22
Downloads
18 (#836,359)
6 months
6 (#529,161)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?Effy Vayena, Minerva Rivas Velarde, Mahsa Shabani, Gabrielle Samuel, Camille Nebeker, S. Matthew Liao, Peter Kleist, Walter Karlen, Jeff Kahn, Phoebe Friesen, Bobbie Farsides, Edward S. Dove, Alessandro Blasimme, Mark Sheehan, Marcello Ienca & Agata Ferretti - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-13.
Engaging key stakeholders to overcome barriers to studying the quality of research ethics oversight.Holly Fernandez Lynch, Swapnali Chaudhari, Brooke Cholka, Barbara E. Bierer, Megan Singleton, Jessica Rowe, Ann Johnson, Kimberley Serpico, Elisa A. Hurley & Emily E. Anderson - 2023 - Research Ethics 19 (1):62-77.
How Do Accredited Organizations Evaluate the Quality and Effectiveness of Their Human Research Protection Programs?Holly Fernandez Lynch & Holly A. Taylor - 2023 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 14 (1):23-37.
References found in this work
How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.Carl H. Coleman & Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):6-.
Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three african countries: Cameroon, Mali and tanzania.Jérôme Ateudjieu, John Williams, Marie Hirtle, Cédric Baume, Joyce Ikingura, Alassane Niaré & Dominique Sprumont - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):88-98.
Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection.Michael McDonald & Susan Cox - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):1-16.
Beyond compliance... is it too much to ask?Greg Koski - 2002 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 25 (5):5-6.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-dmxst uwo