Respuesta al comentario de David Camilo Téllez Guzmán. “Berkeley: el papel de Dios en la teoría de la visión.” / Reply to criticism of my article on The Role of God in Berkeley's Theory of Vision

Ideas Y Valores 66 (163):409 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discussion about one of my papers on Berkeley

Similar books and articles

En la intemperie, númenes.Pelayo Pérez García - 2005 - El Catoblepas: Revista Crítica Del Presente.
An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision Berkeley in the Modern Context.David Vernon - 1992 - Trinity College, Department of Computer Science.
Respuesta a "Respuesta a un comentario bibliográfico distorsionador".Carlos Lungarzo - 1986 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 12 (1):73.
Discussion: Berkeley's New Theory of Vision.David M. Armstrong - 1956 - Journal of the History of Ideas 17 (1):127-129.
Berkeley's revolution in vision.Margaret Atherton - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Berkeley's New Theory of Vision: Science of Metaphysics?Luc Peterschmitt - 2011 - In Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), Berkeley's lasting legacy: 300 years later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-08

Downloads
170 (#114,957)

6 months
55 (#84,373)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references