Understanding and explaining adjudication

New York: Oxford University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is the first book that attempts to analyze and define the metholodology and values of contemporary accounts of adjudication, which can be divided into orthodox philosophies on the one hand and heretical accounts on the other. The author offers an incisive and original analysis of how these supposedly incompatible accounts actually differ.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Law and justice in community.Garrett Barden - 2010 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Tim Murphy.
Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 1.Leslie Green & Brian Leiter (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
How to Speak the Truth.Timothy A. O. Endicott - 2001 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 46 (1):229-248.
Jurisprudence.David Brooke - 2011 - Routledge. Edited by David Brooke.
Jurisprudence.Roscoe Pound - 1959 - Union, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange.
Jurisprudence: themes and concepts.Scott Veitch, Emilios A. Christodoulidis & Lindsay Farmer - 2007 - New York: Routledge-Cavendish. Edited by Emilios A. Christodoulidis & Marco Goldoni.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#400,484)

6 months
3 (#984,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Raz on necessity.Brian H. Bix - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (6):537 - 559.
Interpretation of Law and Judges Communities.Marek Zirk-Sadowski - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (4):473-487.
Teoría del Derecho: tipos y propósitos.Brian Bix - 2006 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 25:57-68.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references