Colonial pride and metropolitan expectations: the British Museum and Melbourne's meteorites

British Journal for the History of Science 27 (1):65-87 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The four-year wrangle over the ownership of what was then thought to have been the largest known meteorite, recognized near Melbourne in 1860, provides a fine-grained example of the interaction between scientific internationalism, metropolitan appetite for specimens, and colonial civic pride.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Plantation science: improving natural indigo in colonial India, 1860–1913.Prakash Kumar - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Science 40 (4):537-565.
A Linguist’s View of “Pride”.Anna Gladkova - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (2):178-179.
Hume on the Dignity of Pride.Jacqueline Taylor - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1):29-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
20 (#772,987)

6 months
5 (#649,290)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mary Anning (1799–1847) of Lyme; ‘the greatest fossilist the world ever knew’.Hugh Torrens - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Science 28 (3):257-284.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references