In response to ʺThe negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID‐19‐related research in Ecuadorʺ

&
Developing World Bioethics 21 (3):100-101 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Developing World Bioethics, Volume 21, Issue 3, Page 100-101, September 2021.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/dewb.12326

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In response to ʺThe negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID‐19‐related research in Ecuadorʺ.Tannya Lozada & Miguel Angel Garcia-Bereguiain - 2021 - Developing World Bioethics 21 (3):100-101.
The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID‐19‐related research in Ecuador.Ivan Sisa, Belen Mena & Enrique Teran - 2021 - Developing World Bioethics 21 (1):3-6.
Tis but a scratch: The human tissue act and the use of tissue for research, issues for research ethics committees.David Hunter - unknown
COVID-19 human challenge trials – what research ethics committees need to consider.Lisa Tambornino & Dirk Lanzerath - 2020 - Research Ethics 16 (3-4):1-11.
Ethical Review of Animal Research and the Standards of Procedural Justice: A European Perspective.Tomasz Pietrzykowski - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (3):525-534.
Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.R. Dal-Re, J. Espada & R. Ortega - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):268-273.
Evaluation of case consultations in clinical ethics committees.Reidun Førde & Reidar Pedersen - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (1):45-50.
Seeing beyond COVID-19: understanding the impact of the pandemic on oncology, and the importance of preparedness.Daniele Carrieri & Fedro Alessandro Peccatori - 2020 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (4):1-5.
Key Ethical Concepts and Their Application to COVID-19 Research.Angus Dawson, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Michael Parker, Maxwell J. Smith & Teck Chuan Voo - 2020 - Public Health Ethics 13 (2):127-132.
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
A Positive Role of Negative Mood on Creativity: The Opportunity in the Crisis of the COVID-19 Epidemic.Ying Du, Yilong Yang, Xuewei Wang, Cong Xie, Chunyu Liu, Weiping Hu & Yadan Li - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Ethics Committees: Group Process Concerns and the Need for Research.Gregory J. Hayes - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):83.
The value of sharing genomic findings with research ethics committees.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (2):59-64.
Positive and Negative Experiences of Living in COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Italian Adolescents’ Narratives.Chiara Fioretti, Benedetta Emanuela Palladino, Annalaura Nocentini & Ersilia Menesini - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Reconsidering ‘ethics’ and ‘quality’ in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.Fiona A. Stevenson, William Gibson, Caroline Pelletier, Vasiliki Chrysikou & Sophie Park - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-23

Downloads
2 (#1,806,630)

6 months
1 (#1,475,652)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references