Density Matrix in Quantum Mechanics and Distinctness of Ensembles Having the Same Compressed Density Matrix

Foundations of Physics 36 (8):1217-1243 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We clarify different definitions of the density matrix by proposing the use of different names, the full density matrix for a single-closed quantum system, the compressed density matrix for the averaged single molecule state from an ensemble of molecules, and the reduced density matrix for a part of an entangled quantum system, respectively. We show that ensembles with the same compressed density matrix can be physically distinguished by observing fluctuations of various observables. This is in contrast to a general belief that ensembles with the same compressed density matrix are identical. Explicit expression for the fluctuation of an observable in a specified ensemble is given. We have discussed the nature of nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computing. We show that the conclusion that there is no quantum entanglement in the current nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computing experiment is based on the unjustified belief that ensembles having the same compressed density matrix are identical physically. Related issues in quantum communication are also discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Density Matrix in the de Broglie--Bohm Approach.O. J. E. Maroney - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (3):493-510.
Landau's density matrix in quantum electrodynamics.L. Diósi - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (1):63-70.
The density matrix of scattered particles.Roger G. Newton - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (11-12):929-935.
Fluctuations in the dynamics of single quantum systems.Anton Amann & Harald Atmanspacher - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (2):151-182.
Can one detect the state of an individual system?L. E. Ballentine - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (3):333-342.
Interpreting the density matrix of the universe.Don N. Page - 1991 - In A. Ashtekar & J. Stachel (eds.), Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity. Birkhauser. pp. 1--116.
Random matrices, fermions, collective fields, and universality.B. Sakita - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (11):1519-1525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
103 (#171,046)

6 months
13 (#202,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations