Cassam and Kant on "how possible" questions and categorial thinking

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):510-517 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00318205

DOI

10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00202.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Kant's "I think" versus Descartes' "I am a thing that thinks".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 9--31.
Judging, believing and thinking.Quassim Cassam - 2010 - Philosophical Issues 20 (1):80-95.
Kant and reductionism.Quassim Cassam - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (1):72-106.
The possibility of knowledge • by Quassim Cassam • oxford university press, 2007. X + 256 pp. £32.00 cloth: Summary. [REVIEW]Quassim Cassam - 2009 - Analysis 69 (2):307-309.
Manfred Kuehn: Kant - A Biography. [REVIEW]Thomas Sturm - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):476-479.
Reply to Longuenesse. [REVIEW]Quassim Cassam - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):525-531.
Reply to béatrice Longuenesse.Quassim Cassam - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
154 (#123,842)

6 months
16 (#159,435)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Béatrice Longuenesse
New York University

Citations of this work

Kant and the Pre-Conceptual Use of the Understanding.Jonas Jervell Indregard - 2021 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103 (1):93-119.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references