- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Search and Coherence-Building in Intuition and Insight Problem Solving
Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The interpretative heuristic in insight problem solving.Laura Macchi & Maria Bagassi - 2014 - Mind and Society 13 (1):97-108.
The contributions of convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and schizotypy to solving insight and non-insight problems.Margaret E. Webb, Daniel R. Little, Simon J. Cropper & Kayla Roze - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (3):235-258.
A model of knowledge activation and insight in problem solving.Matthew A. Cronin - 2004 - Complexity 9 (5):17-24.
The Phenomenology of Problem Solving.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2017 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 94 (3):391-409.
Stepping out of history: Mindfulness improves insight problem solving.Brian D. Ostafin & Kyle T. Kassman - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):1031-1036.
Cues to solution, restructuring patterns, and reports of insight in creative problem solving.Patrick J. Cushen & Jennifer Wiley - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1166-1175.
Overtly prompting people to “think in opposites” supports insight problem solving.Ivana Bianchi, Erika Branchini, Roberto Burro, Elena Capitani & Ugo Savardi - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 26 (1):31-67.
Distinguishing insight from intuition.Rachel Henley - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (2-3):2-3.
Intuitive and analytical processes in insight problem solving: a psycho-rhetorical approach to the study of reasoning.Laura Macchi & Maria Bagassi - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):53-67.
Can Contraries Prompt Intuition in Insight Problem Solving?Erika Branchini, Ivana Bianchi, Roberto Burro, Elena Capitani & Ugo Savardi - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Intuition and visualization in mathematical problem solving.Valeria Giardino - 2010 - Topoi 29 (1):29-39.
Connect 4: A Novel Paradigm to Elicit Positive and Negative Insight and Search Problem Solving.Gillian Hill & Shelly M. Kemp - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Time of day effects on problem solving: When the non-optimal is optimal.Mareike B. Wieth & Rose T. Zacks - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):387 - 401.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-09-25
Downloads
12 (#1,092,565)
6 months
4 (#799,256)
2019-09-25
Downloads
12 (#1,092,565)
6 months
4 (#799,256)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Feelings-of-Warmth Increase More Abruptly for Verbal Riddles Solved With in Contrast to Without Aha! Experience.Jasmin M. Kizilirmak, Violetta Serger, Judith Kehl, Michael Öllinger, Kristian Folta-Schoofs & Alan Richardson-Klavehn - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
A comparison of information processing and dynamical systems perspectives on problem solving.Stephen K. Reed & Robin R. Vallacher - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 26 (2):254-290.
Aha! under pressure: The Aha! experience is not constrained by cognitive load.Hans Stuyck, Axel Cleeremans & Eva Van den Bussche - 2022 - Cognition 219 (C):104946.
References found in this work
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Advancing the Debate.Jonathan Evans & Keith E. Stanovich - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):223-241.
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-qczmr uwo