The Paradigm of the Wild, Cultural Diversity, and Chinese Environmentalism

Environmental Ethics 42 (3):223-235 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The so-called “Paradigm of the Wild” means either environmental ethics or environmental aesthetics has gone wild. According to Holmes Rolston, III, “philosophy has gone wild.” Chinese traditional environmentalism takes another anthropocosmic way, and it has a global applicability in cultural diversity. The dichotomy of “nature-culture” is already out of date, and humans have to face the new relation of humanized-nature today. From the perspec­tive of “ethics and aesthetics” in Chinese Confucianism, a different passageway between environmental ethics and environmental aesthetics can be shaped.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Intrinsic Value to the Emotion of Wonder.Gao Shan - 2018 - Environmental Ethics 40 (1):81-91.
Born to be Wild.Irene Klaver, Jozef Keulartz & Henk van den Belt - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (1):3-21.
Wilderness in Ancient Chinese Landscape Painting.LuYang Chen & Ziao Chen - 2020 - Environmental Ethics 42 (3):253-266.
Fatal Attraction.Martin Drenthen - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (3):297-315.
The Biomimicry Revolution in Environmental Epistemology.Henry Dicks - 2019 - Ethics and the Environment 24 (2):43.
Rewilding in Cultural Layered Landscapes.Martin Drenthen - 2018 - Environmental Values 27 (4):325-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-28

Downloads
16 (#925,932)

6 months
2 (#1,240,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references