Emotionales Versus Rationales: A Comparison Between Confucius’ and Socrates’ Ethics

Asian Philosophy 23 (1):86-99 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Socrates regards rational knowledge as the decisive factor of human life and even ascribes all virtues and moral actions to it, thereby stressing the ‘rationales’ of ethics. In contrast, Confucius regards kinship love as the decisive factor of human life and even grounds all virtues and moral actions on it, thereby stressing the ‘emotionales’ of ethics. Therefore, we should not lump them together by conceiving Confucius’ ethics also as based on ‘moral reason’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The beginning of ethics: Confucius and socrates.Jiyuan Yu - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):173 – 189.
Virtue Ethics and Confucian Ethics.Lai Chen - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (3):275-287.
Confucius’s View of Courage.Xinyan Jiang - 2012 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):44-59.
Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle.Jiyuan Yu - 1998 - Philosophy East and West 48 (2):323-347.
Confucius and the Effortless Life of Virtue.Hagop Sarkissian - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (1):1-16.
The art of becoming human: Morality in Kant and confucius.Katrin Froese - 2008 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (3):257-268.
Ethics.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Socrates and confucius: Moral agents or moral philosophers?G. H. Mahood - 1971 - Philosophy East and West 21 (2):177-188.
Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed.Yong Huang - 2013 - Bloomsbury Publishing.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-24

Downloads
60 (#269,845)

6 months
5 (#648,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A treatise of human nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1977 - New York: Dutton. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch.
A treatise of human nature.David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb (eds.) - 1977 - New York: Dutton.
A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40).David Hume - 1969 - Mineola, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.
A treatise of human nature.David Hume - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

View all 36 references / Add more references