Eyelid trace conditioning, CS intensity, CS-UCS interval, and a correction for "spontaneous" blinking

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):216 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0023448

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

CS intensity and CS-UCS interval effects in human eyelid conditioning.Harold D. Fishbein, Paul D. Jones & Colin Silverthorne - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):109.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Second interval discrimination conditioning of the GSR as a function of UCS intensity and trace and delay conditioning paradigms.Arthur R. Zeiner - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):276.
Comparison of trace and delay classical eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Susan M. Ross & Leonard E. Ross - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):165.
Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):417.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):131.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Kenneth W. Spence & Eugenia B. Norris - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):716.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
The effect on eyelid conditioning of shifting the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):423.
Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of the UCS.Kenneth W. Spence - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):57.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR.K. W. Spence, D. F. Haggard & L. E. Ross - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (5):404.
Intertrial responding and CS intensity in classical eyelid conditioning.Michaela Mattson & John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):396.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
22 (#714,863)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references