Legitimizing dialogue as textual and ideological goal in academic writing for assessment and publication

Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 10 (4):401-432 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The semiotic world that we inhabit is fast changing in terms of the resources that are used and the practices in which many engage. Yet the institutional norms governing highly consequential academic texts – students’ texts assessed as part of their disciplinary-based activity and scholars’ papers submitted for publication – lack engagement with this array of resources and, epistemologically, continue to drive a monologic stance towards academic meaning making. The aim of this article is to argue for a reconfiguring of the textual goal of academic writing, through one simple yet transformative tool, that of juxtaposition. Textual juxtaposition is illustrated in this article, and its intellectual and ideological value discussed, drawing on Bakhtin’s emphasis on dialogue, using several examples from published academic texts. The relevance to scholarly and student writing is explored

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
3 (#1,724,854)

6 months
2 (#1,250,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Marginal Gloss.Lawrence Lipking - 1977 - Critical Inquiry 3 (4):609-655.
A Space For Academic Play: Student Learning Journals As Transitional Writing.Phyllis Creme - 2008 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 7 (1):49-64.
Developing writer identity through a multidisciplinary programme.Phyllis Creme & Colleen Mckenna - 2010 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9 (2):149-167.

Add more references