- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees
Rebecca H. Li, Mary C. Wacholtz, Mark Barnes, Liam Boggs, Susan Callery-D'Amico, Amy Davis, Alla Digilova, David Forster, Kate Heffernan, Maeve Luthin, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Lindsay McNair, Jennifer E. Miller, Jacquelyn Murphy, Luann Van Campen, Mark Wilenzick, Delia Wolf, Cris Woolston, Carmen Aldinger & Barbara E. Bierer
Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (4):229-234 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Evaluating the work of ethical review committees: an observation and a suggestion.T. Harding & M. Ummel - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4):191-194.
Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.R. Dal-Re, J. Espada & R. Ortega - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):268-273.
The activity of French Research Ethics Committees and characteristics of biomedical research protocols involving humans: a retrospective cohort study. [REVIEW]Evelyne Decullier, Véronique Lhéritier & François Chapuis - 2005 - BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-10.
The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium.T. Meulenbergs - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):318-321.
Ethics and epistemology of accurate prediction in clinical research.Spencer Phillips Hey - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):559-562.
Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical review.Marlies van Lent, Gerard A. Rongen & Henk J. Out - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):83.
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
Toward a methodology for the ethical analysis of clinical practice.Corrado Viafora - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):283-297.
Creating a Controlled Vocabulary for the Ethics of Human Research: Towards a biomedical ethics ontology.David Koepsell, Robert Arp, Jennifer Fostel & Barry Smith - 2009 - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 4 (1):43-58.
Clinical trials: two neglected ethical issues.A. Herxheimer - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):211-218.
Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.E. Atici & A. D. Erdemir - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):297-300.
A Relational Ethical Dialogue With Research Ethics Committees.Philip J. Larkin, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé & Paul Schotsmans - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (2):234-242.
Principlism and the ethical appraisal of clinical trials.Heather J. Sutherland Eric M. Meslin - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (4):399-418.
Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority.S. McGuinness - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):695-700.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-12-20
Downloads
35 (#455,462)
6 months
18 (#140,646)
2017-12-20
Downloads
35 (#455,462)
6 months
18 (#140,646)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The development of a clinical policy ethics assessment tool.Diego José Garcia-Capilla, Alfonso Rubio-Navarro, Maria José Torralba-Madrid & Jane Rutty - 2019 - Nursing Ethics 26 (7-8):2259-2277.
References found in this work
Reasons Why Post-Trial Access to Trial Drugs Should, or Need not be Ensured to Research Participants: A Systematic Review.N. Sofaer & D. Strech - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):160-184.
Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: What Do Investigators Owe Research Participants?Franklin G. Miller, Michelle M. Mello & Steven Joffe - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):271-279.
The ambiguity and the exigency: Clarifying 'standard of care' arguments in international research.Alex John London - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):379 – 397.
Protecting Communities in Research: Current Guidelines and Limits of Extrapolation.Charles Weijer, Gary Goldsand & Ezekiel J. Emanuel - unknown
Compensation for subjects of medical research: the moral rights of patients and the power of research ethics committees.S. Guest - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (3):181-185.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-g9b9l uwo