- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Normative Evaluation of Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice: From Invasiveness to Human Rights
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (1):23-25 (2023)
Abstract
Medical interventions are usually categorized as “invasive” when they involve piercing the skin or inserting an object into the body. However, the findings of Bluhm and collaborators (2023) (hencef...Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice.David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Do Criminal Offenders Have a Right to Neurorehabilitation?Emma Dore-Horgan - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (2):429-451.
‘Drugs That Make You Feel Bad’? Remorse-Based Mitigation and Neurointerventions.Jonathan Pugh & Hannah Maslen - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):499-522.
Rights in Criminal Law in the Light of a Will Theory.Elias Moser - 2019 - Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (3):176-197.
Invasiveness is Inevitable in Psychiatric Neurointerventions.Nick J. Davis - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (1):13-15.
Can Neurointerventions Communicate Censure? (And So What If They Can’t?).David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
A Human Right not to be Punished? Punishment as Derogation of Rights.J. D. Shepherd - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):31-45.
Crime, justice and human rights.Leanne Weber - 2014 - New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. Edited by Marinella Marmo & Elaine Fishwick.
The Will Theory of Rights and Criminal Law.Elisa Moser - 2020 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 106 (1):55-74.
Closed-Loop Brain Devices in Offender Rehabilitation: Autonomy, Human Rights, and Accountability.Sjors Ligthart, Tijs Kooijmans, Thomas Douglas & Gerben Meynen - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4):669-680.
Social deprivation and criminal justice.Kimberley Brownlee - 2012 - In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Introduction.Thomas Douglas & David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fair Trials and International Courts: A Critical Evaluation of the Nuremberg Legacy.Aaron Fichtelberg - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (1):5-24.
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Dimensions of justice: ethical issues in the administration of criminal law.William C. Heffernan - 2015 - Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-01-05
Downloads
24 (#661,118)
6 months
9 (#317,960)
2023-01-05
Downloads
24 (#661,118)
6 months
9 (#317,960)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
What makes a medical intervention invasive?Gabriel De Marco, Jannieke Simons, Lisa Forsberg & Thomas Douglas - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (4):226-233.
References found in this work
Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity.Thomas Douglas - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):101-122.
“They Are Invasive in Different Ways.”: Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Invasiveness of Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions.Robyn Bluhm, Marissa Cortright, Eric D. Achtyes & Laura Y. Cabrera - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (1):1-12.
Closed-Loop Brain Devices in Offender Rehabilitation: Autonomy, Human Rights, and Accountability.Sjors Ligthart, Tijs Kooijmans, Thomas Douglas & Gerben Meynen - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4):669-680.
Objections to Coercive Neurocorrectives for Criminal Offenders –Why Offenders’ Human Rights Should Fundamentally Come First.Lando Kirchmair - 2019 - Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (1):19-40.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-cc9fg uwo