Generics and the Metaphysics of Kinds

Philosophy Compass (7):1-14 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent years have seen renewed interest in the semantics of generics. And a relatively mainstream view in this work is that the semantics of generics must appeal to kinds. But what are kinds? Can we learn anything about their nature by looking at how semantic theories of generics appeal to them? In this article, we overview recent work on the semantics of generics and consider their consequences for our understanding of the metaphysics of kinds.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-18

Downloads
483 (#39,690)

6 months
146 (#23,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Liebesman
University of Calgary
Rachel Katharine Sterken
University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

Why use generic language in science?Olivier Lemeire - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Generic Excluded Middle.James Ravi Kirkpatrick - forthcoming - Philosophers' Imprint.
Implicit Bias and Qualiefs.Martina Fürst - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-34.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures.Saul A. Kripke - 2013 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The things we mean.Stephen R. Schiffer - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonexistence.Nathan Salmon - 1998 - Noûs 32 (3):277-319.
Generics: Cognition and acquisition.Sarah-Jane Leslie - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):1-47.

View all 29 references / Add more references