Do CEOs with Sent-Down Movement Experience Foster Corporate Environmental Responsibility?

Journal of Business Ethics 185 (1):147-168 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As environmental issues have become increasingly prominent around the world, corporate environmental responsibility has begun to attract more attention. As the decision-makers of firms, top executives play an important role in the environmentally ethical behavior of their corporations. Few studies, however, have explored the motivations behind corporations’ environmentally responsible behavior from the perspective of how CEOs’ early experiences shape their decisions. This paper explores the impact that CEOs who experienced the Send-down movement have on their companies’ environmentally responsible behavior and the boundary conditions of this impact from the perspective of the imprinting theory. Based on the data of listed Chinese companies from 2009 to 2020, we have found that CEOs who were themselves “Sent-down youth” have a positive impact on corporate environmental responsibility. For firms with a higher proportion of state ownership and CEOs with Chinese Communist Party membership, the relationship between experience with the Send-down movement and corporate environmental responsibility is strengthened, whereas a higher level of market competition weakens the relationship. This article enriches and deepens the research on the imprinting theory, and it also has certain practical implications for firms that hire top executives with unique types of early experiences to promote business ethics improvement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erratum: Applying the Principles of Gestalt Theory to Teaching Ethics.[author unknown] - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):880-880.
Editorial: Conferences on Value Inquiry.James B. Wilbur - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):403-403.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):163-163.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1-1.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (4):I-I.
Introduction.Hart Kevin & Hartman Geoffrey - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):101-101.
Call for papers.Michael-Owen Dr - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 64 (3):iii-iii.
Introduction.Darryl Reed & J. J. McMurtry - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (Suppl 1):1-2.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Deborah C. Poff - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 2 (3):73-77.
Introduction.W. Michael Hoffman - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (7):535-535.
Announcement and Call Papers.[author unknown] - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 60 (3):3-4.
Erratum to Jackall and Iannone.[author unknown] - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):732-732.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-10

Downloads
23 (#684,486)

6 months
12 (#217,158)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations