- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Hypothesis testing in Wason's selection task: social exchange cheating detection or task understanding
Cognition 58 (1):127-156 (1996)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Questioning the cheater-detection hypothesis: New studies with the selection task.Erica Carlisle & Eldar Shafir - 2005 - Thinking and Reasoning 11 (2):97 – 122.
The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.Leda Cosmides - 1989 - Cognition 31 (3):187-276.
How do individuals reason in the Wason card selection task?Eric-Jan Wagenmakers - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):104-104.
Hypothesis testing: Strategy selection for generalising versus limiting hypotheses.Barbara A. Spellman - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (1):67 – 92.
Darwinian algorithms and the Wason selection task: A factorial analysis of social contract selection task problems.Richard D. Platt & Richard A. Griggs - 1993 - Cognition 48 (2):163-192.
Looking the Other Way.David M. Wasieleski - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:44-48.
Rationality and the Wason Selection Task: a Logical Account.Simone Duca - 2009 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 15 (1):109-131.
Does Job Function Influence Ethical Reasoning? An Adapted Wason Task Application.David M. Wasieleski & James Weber - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S1):187 - 199.
Conditional reasoning and the Wason selection task: Biconditional interpretation instead of reasoning bias.Pascal Wagner-Egger - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):484 – 505.
Hempel's paradox and Wason's selection task: Logical and psychological puzzles of confirmation.Raymond S. Nickerson - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (1):1 – 31.
Matching versus optimal data selection in the Wason selection task.Hiroshi Yama - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):295 – 311.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
17 (#892,088)
6 months
2 (#1,250,897)
2014-01-20
Downloads
17 (#892,088)
6 months
2 (#1,250,897)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.Philip Johnson-Laird & Ruth M. J. Byrne - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (4):646-678.
No interpretation without representation: the role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task.Laurence Fiddick, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby - 2000 - Cognition 77 (1):1-79.
Illusory inferences: a novel class of erroneous deductions.P. N. Johnson-Laird & Fabien Savary - 1999 - Cognition 71 (3):191-229.
Cognitive ability and variation in selection task performance.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (3):193-230.
References found in this work
The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.Leda Cosmides - 1989 - Cognition 31 (3):187-276.
Reasoning.Peter C. Wason - 1966 - In B. Foss (ed.), New Horizons in Psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. pp. 135-151.
Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.Daniel Kahneman & Dale T. Miller - 1986 - Psychological Review 93 (2):136-153.
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.Joshua Klayman & Young-won Ha - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (2):211-228.
Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Patricia W. Cheng & Keith J. Holyoak - 1985 - Cognitive Psychology 17 (4):391-416.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-pwpjr uwo