The poetics of ancient greek memory and the historical imperative

History and Theory 52 (3):451-461 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book examines Greek engagements with the past as articulations of memory formulated against the contingency of chance associated with temporality. Based on a phenomenological understanding of temporality, it identifies four memorializing strategies: continuity , regularity , development, and acceptance of chance. This framework serves in pursuing a twofold aim: to reconstruct the literary field of memory in fifth-century bce Greece; and to interpret Greek historiography as a memorializing mode. The key contention advanced by this approach is that acts of memory entailed an “idea of history” that was articulated not only in historiography, but also in epinician poetry, elegy, tragedy, and oratory. The book offers a rich account of poetic conventions and contexts through which each of these genres counterbalanced contingency through the use of exemplary and traditional modes of memory. This fine analysis highlights the grip of the present on the past as a significant feature of both historiographical and nonhistoriographical genres.The essay argues that this work fills a disciplinary gap by extending the reflection on memory to a new period, Greek antiquity. The retrospective positioning of this period at the outset of Western historical thought brings Grethlein's investigation to the center of debates about memory, temporality, and the meaning history. In engaging with the book's argument, the essay suggests that historiographical memory emerged in Greece not as a first-order encounter with time, but as a second-order encounter with forgetting. This confrontation marked a certain separation of historiography from other memorializing genres. Whereas poetic and rhetorical memories were posited against contingency, historiography sought to retrieve those aspects of the past that may otherwise have been irretrievably lost and forgotten. In doing so, it formulated the historiographical imperative as a negation of forgetting that problematized the truth-value of memory and the very act of remembering the past

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Memory and History.Dmitri Nikulin - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (1-2):75-90.
The moral and political burdens of memory. [REVIEW]Richard B. Miller - 2009 - Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):533-564.
Memory, history, forgetting.Paul Ricœur - 2004 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Historical perspectives on memory.Anne Ollila (ed.) - 1999 - Helsinki: SHS.
Towards a Phenomenology of Memory and Forgetting.Alexandre Dessingué - 2011 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 2 (1):168-178.
To Remember Memory.Ella Buceniece - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:15-24.
Memory and the Construction of Personality.Remo Bodei - 2011 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 3 (5):87-98.
The nature of forgetting from short-term memory.Paul Muter - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):134-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
21 (#759,848)

6 months
4 (#859,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references