Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: The blastocyst transfer method

American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):8 – 16 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite the therapeutic potential of human embryonic stem (HES) cells, many people believe that HES cell research should be banned. The reason is that the present method of extracting HES cells involves the destruction of the embryo, which for many is the beginning of a person. This paper examines a number of compromise solutions such as parthenogenesis, the use of defective embryos, genetically creating a "pseudo embryo" that can never form a placenta, and determining embryo death, and argues that none of these proposals are likely to satisfy embryoists, that is, those who regard the embryo as a person. This paper then proposes a method of extracting HES cells, what might be called the Blastocyst Transfer Method, that meets the ethical requirements of embryoists, and it considers some possible concerns regarding this method. It concludes by encouraging future HES cell research to investigate this method.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
141 (#133,039)

6 months
9 (#317,960)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

S. Matthew Liao
New York University

Citations of this work

Animal Eggs for Stem Cell Research: A Path Not Worth Taking.Françoise Baylis - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):18-32.
Embryological viability.Françoise Baylis - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):17 – 18.
What qualifies as a live embryo?David Wasserman - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):23 – 25.
Blastocyst transfer (sic) is no solution.John A. Robertson - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):18 – 20.
Can we really bypass the moral debate for embryo research?Zubin Master - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):27 – 28.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Saviour siblings.M. Spriggs - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):289-289.
The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection.S. Liao - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):116-118.
The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection.S. Matthew Liao - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):116-118.

View all 9 references / Add more references