Laboratory Specimens and Genetic Privacy: Evolution of Legal Theory

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (s1):65-68 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although laboratory specimens are an important resource for biomedical research, controversy has arisen when research has been conducted without the knowledge or consent of the individuals who were the source of the specimens. This paper summarizes the most important litigation regarding the research use of laboratory specimens and traces the evolution of legal theory from property claims to claims related to genetic privacy interests

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/jlme.12042

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Responsibilities and obligations of using human research specimens transported across national boundaries.A. S. Muula & J. M. Mfutso-Bengo - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):35-38.
Protecting the privacy of genetic information.Andrew B. Serwin - unknown
Discovering discovery: How faraday found the first metallic colloid.Ryan D. Tweney - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (1):97-121.
An Intrusion Theory of Privacy.George E. Panichas - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):145-161.
Privacy and policy for genetic research.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Survival of the Fairest? Evolution and the Geneticization of Rights.David Keane - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (3):467-494.
Philosophical theories of privacy: Implications for an adequate online privacy policy.Herman T. Tavani - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (1):1–22.
Patient Autonomy and the Freedom to Act against One's Self-Interest.Jennifer Wilson Mulnix - 2008 - Clinical Laboratory Science 21 (2):114-115.
Biobanks for non-clinical purposes and the new law on forensic biobanks: does the Italian context protect the rights of minors?Pamela Tozzo, Renzo Pegoraro & Luciana Caenazzo - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):775-778.
Individualism, type specimens, and the scrutability of species membership.Alex Levine - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (3):325-38.
Knowledge, money and data: an integrated account of the evolution of eight types of laboratory.Arjan van Rooij - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Science 44 (3):427-448.
The problem of ignoring interconnectedness in genetic research.James F. Meschia - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):477-477.
Donor perspectives on issues associated with donation of genetic Samples and information: An australian viewpoint. [REVIEW]Margaret Otlowski - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (2):135-150.
Democracy and genetic privacy: The value of bodily integrity. [REVIEW]Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (1):97-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
5 (#1,546,680)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references