The Case for “Service”

Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 28 (3/4):2-8 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As Congress prepares to consider legislation to expand federal support for civilian national service programs, Peter Levine argues that service is good for communities and for those who serve, andthat it can help restore Americans' connection to their government and public life. But service has limitations and should not become universal or mandatory. Voluntary programs of reasonable size are elements of a broader approach to civic renewal

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Service-learning and engineering ethics.Michael S. Pritchard - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):413-422.
The Concept of the Public Good: A View from a Filipino Philosopher.Rolando Gripaldo - 2007 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 36 (2).
Service, quality and human factors.Colin G. Drury - 2003 - AI and Society 17 (2):78-96.
Autonomy: the need for limits.M. Jiwa - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):340-343.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Levine
Tufts University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references