Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation: On the situation of women in science and philosophy

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:56-63 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.08.017

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Katrina Hutchison and Fiona Jenkins : Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?Anna Leuschner - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):245-249.
The Appraisal of Government Service Quality under the Customer-orientation Environment.Jin-Cheng Zhang & Wei-xia Lu - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:125-133.
Interdisciplinarity as Academic Accountability: Prospects for Quality Control Across Disciplinary Boundaries.Katri Huutoniemi - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (2):163-185.
School culture at risk of political and methodological expropriation.Ondrej Kaščák, Branislav Pupala, Ivan Lukšík & Miroslava Lemešová - 2012 - Human Affairs 22 (4):524-538.
Towards a Female-Friendly Philosophy of Science.Janet A. Kourany - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:320-332.
Explanatory exclusion history and social science.Mark Day - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):20-37.
Civil Society and "Women's Movements" in Post-Communist Europe. An Appraisal 25 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall.Yvanka B. Raynova - 2015 - In Community, Praxis, and Values in a Postmetaphysical Age: Studies on Exclusion and Social Integration in Feminist Theory and Contemporary Philosophy. Axia Academic Publishers. pp. 184-204.
Doing evaluation in a process-oriented way: Theoretical implications and methodological problems.Michael Henninger & Heinz Mandl - unknown
Quality of life - evaluation or description.Dietrer Birnbacher - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):25-36.
Methodological quality and reporting of ethical requirements in phase III cancer trials.J. J. Tuech - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5):251-255.
Women in Philosophy: The Costs of Exclusion—Editor's Introduction.Alison Wylie - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (2):374-382.
The Combat Exclusion and the Role of Women in the Military.Judith Wagner Decew - 1995 - Hypatia 10 (1):56-73.
Community, Praxis, and Values in a Postmetaphysical Age: Studies on Exclusion and Social Integration in Feminist Theory and Contemporary Philosophy.Yvanka B. Raynova (ed.) - 2015 - Axia Academic Publishers.
Methodology and Scientific Competition.Max Albert - 2011 - Episteme 8 (2):165-183.
Job Quality and Gender Inequality: Key Changes in Québec over the Last Decade.Luc Cloutier, Paul Bernard & Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay - 2009 - Studies in Social Justice 3 (2):191-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
39 (#409,882)

6 months
3 (#981,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Ist die Praxis bevorzugter Anstellung moralisch zulässig?Christine Bratu - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 7 (1):301-324.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inductive risk and values in science.Heather Douglas - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):559-579.
Values in Science.Ernan McMullin - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982 (4):3-28.
Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy.Helen E. Longino - 1996 - In Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Jack Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 39--58.

View all 21 references / Add more references