The Saccharin Debate: Regulation and the Public Taste

Hastings Center Report 7 (6):5-7 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3560871

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Taste intensity as a function of area and concentration: Differentiation between compounds.David V. Smith - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):163.
Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.
Saccharin: A case study of government regulation of environmental carcinogens. [REVIEW]Richard A. Merrill & Michael R. Taylor - 1986 - Agriculture and Human Values 3 (1-2):33-72.
Taste and objectivity: The emergence of the concept of the aesthetic.Elisabeth Schellekens - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743.
The sugar industry, political authorities, and scientific institutions in the regulation of saccharin: Valencia (1888–1939). [REVIEW]Ximo Guillem-Llobat - 2011 - Annals of Science 68 (3):401-424.
Some properties of saccharin as a reinforcer.George Collier - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):184.
Saccharin and the public interest.Elizabeth M. Whelan & William R. Havender - 1986 - Agriculture and Human Values 3 (1-2):74-82.
Journalism Ethics and Regulation.Chris Frost - 2010 - New York, NY: Pearson.
Taste learning in rodents: Compounds and individual taste cues recognition.Milagros Gallo - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):80-81.
The labeled line / basic taste versus across-fiber pattern debate: A red Herring?Edward Alan Fox - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):79-80.
The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
I the classic debate on media regulation.Peter Golding - 1998 - In Kees Brants, Joke Hermes & Liesbet van Zoonen (eds.), The media in question: popular cultures and public interests. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. pp. 7.
Regulation of hESC research in australia: Promises and pitfalls for deliberative democratic approaches.Susan Dodds & Rachel A. Ankeny - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):95-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
11 (#1,160,245)

6 months
3 (#1,034,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references