Reply to Deng, Hesse and Gäb

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):203-213 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am very grateful to Natalja, Jacob and Sebastian for their kind attention to my paper, and for their many insights on this topic, which have materially helped me get clearer about some of the issues. All the points of disagreement are constructive and it has been both a pleasure and an education to engage with them. I’m also happy to note some points of agreement, too! Here I attempt to reply to some of the objections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Agnosticism and Fictionalism: A Reply to Le Poidevin.Natalja Deng - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):183-188.
Replies to Deng, Lee, and Skow.Simon Prosser - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (3):328-350.
Reply to Mary Hesse.Larry Laudan - 1971 - The Monist 55 (3):525-525.
The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr’s Reply to EPR.Michael Dickson - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:263-275.
Replies to Commentators.Keith DeRose - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (3):284-320.
Replies to Commentators.Keith DeRose - 2020 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 10 (1):68-104.
In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.Peter Forrest - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-25

Downloads
25 (#646,442)

6 months
9 (#343,268)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robin Le Poidevin
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references