Why pure mathematical truths are metaphysically necessary: a set-theoretic explanation

Synthese 197 (7):3113-3120 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pure mathematical truths are commonly thought to be metaphysically necessary. Assuming the truth of pure mathematics as currently pursued, and presupposing that set theory serves as a foundation of pure mathematics, this article aims to provide a metaphysical explanation of why pure mathematics is metaphysically necessary.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant on the `symbolic construction' of mathematical concepts.Lisa Shabel - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (4):589-621.
Wittgenstein on pure and applied mathematics.Ryan Dawson - 2014 - Synthese 191 (17):4131-4148.
Mathematics, Metaphysics and Intuition in Kant.Emily Carson - 1996 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Logical foundations of applied mathematics.V. V. Nalimov - 1974 - Synthese 27 (1-2):211 - 250.
Provability and mathematical truth.David Fair - 1984 - Synthese 61 (3):363 - 385.
Scanlon’s modal metaphysics.Gideon Rosen - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):856-876.
What Are Mathematical Coincidences ?M. Lange - 2010 - Mind 119 (474):307-340.
Applying pure mathematics.Anthony Peressini - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):13.
Some Laws of Nature are Metaphysically Contingent.John T. Roberts - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):445-457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-19

Downloads
138 (#137,438)

6 months
16 (#172,704)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hannes Leitgeb
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Angellic Content.Kit Fine - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):199-226.
A logic for 'because'.Benjamin Schnieder - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):445-465.

View all 21 references / Add more references