- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What is a self-referential sentence? Critical remarks on the alleged mbox(non-)circularity of Yablo's paradox
Logique and Analyse 177 (178):3-14 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Circularity and Paradox.Stephen Yablo - 2006 - In Thomas Bolander, Vincent F. Hendricks & Stig Andur Pedersen (eds.), Self-Reference. CSLI Publications. pp. 139--157.
Yablo's paradox and referring to infinite objects.O. Bueno & M. Colyvan - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-17
Downloads
2 (#1,815,597)
6 months
1 (#1,508,411)
2010-08-17
Downloads
2 (#1,815,597)
6 months
1 (#1,508,411)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Leśniewski's Systems of Logic and Foundations of Mathematics.Rafal Urbaniak - 2013 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
The Elimination of Self-Reference: Generalized Yablo-Series and the Theory of Truth.P. Schlenker - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (3):251-307.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-srv9n uwo