Unilateral Withdrawal, Technological Creep, and the Role of Proportionality in ECMO Policy

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):68-70 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a well-known American legal maxim, hard cases make bad law. If we agree that Mr. J’s case is hard, what lessons follow from the application of current ECMO guidelines and what kind of supp...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ECMO Bridge and 5 Paths.Arthur R. Derse - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):1-4.
Why Deny ECMO-DT to the Incapacitated?Kyle E. Karches - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):70-72.
Proportionality in international law.Michael A. Newton - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by Larry May.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
On “Not Recommending” ECMO.Ian D. Wolfe - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (5):5-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-25

Downloads
11 (#1,160,245)

6 months
5 (#700,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Beyond the Essence of Death.Brendan Leier - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):24-25.

Add more references