Learning and Teaching Climate Science: The Perils of Consensus Knowledge Using Agnotology

, &
Science & Education 22 (8):2007-2017 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11191-013-9588-3

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change.David R. Legates, Willie Soon, William M. Briggs & Christopher Monckton of Brenchley - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (3):299-318.
Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change: A Response to Legates, Soon and Briggs.Daniel Bedford & John Cook - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (8):2019-2030.
Challenging knowledge: How climate science became a victim of the Cold War.Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway - 2008 - In Robert N. Proctor & Londa Schiebinger (eds.), Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford University Press Stanford, California. pp. 55--89.
Disconcerting learning on climate sensitivity and the uncertain future of uncertainty.A. Hannart, M. Ghil, Dufresne J. -L. & P. Naveau - unknown
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.
Climate Science, Character, and the "Hard-Won" Consensus.Brent Ranalli - 2012 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2):183-210.
Managing teaching and learning in further and higher education.Kate Ashcroft - 1994 - Washington, DC: Falmer Press. Edited by Lorraine Foreman-Peck.
Tensions in agnotology: Normativity in the studies of commercially driven ignorance.Fernandez Pinto Manuela - 2015 - Social Studies of Science 45 (2):294-315.
Agnotology in/of Archaeology.Alison Wylie - 2008 - In R. Proctor & L. Londa Schiebinger (eds.), Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford University Press. pp. 183-205.
Ignorance Production and Corporate Science.Marilena Danelon - 2015 - Dissertation, Queen’s University
Ethical issues in teaching.Michael Cholbi - 2013 - International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Preservice teachers' views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge.Sherry A. Southerland & Julie Gess‐Newsome - 1999 - Science Education 83 (2):131-150.
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement.Boaz Miller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1293-1316.
To Know or Better Not to: Agnotology and the Social Construction of Ignorance in Commercially Driven Research.Manuela Fernández Pinto - 2017 - Science and Technology Studies 30 (2):53-72.
Social and cultural factors framing the teaching and learning of primary science in Australia, Germany and Taiwan.W. Hackling Mark, S. Chen Hsiao-Lan & Romain Gisela - 2017 - In Hackling M. W., Ramseger J. & Chen H.-L. S. (eds.), Quality teaching in primary science education: Cross cultural perspectives. Springer International Publishing. pp. 19-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-15

Downloads
25 (#651,290)

6 months
8 (#411,621)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance.Robert N. Proctor & Londa Schiebinger (eds.) - 2008 - Stanford University Press Stanford, California.
Underdetermination, Model-ensembles and Surprises: On the Epistemology of Scenario-analysis in Climatology.Gregor Betz - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):3-21.
Challenging knowledge: How climate science became a victim of the Cold War.Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway - 2008 - In Robert N. Proctor & Londa Schiebinger (eds.), Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford University Press Stanford, California. pp. 55--89.

Add more references