Shoemaker on second-order belief and self-deception

Dialogue 41 (2):279-289 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a number of papers, Sydney Shoemaker has argued that first-order belief plus rationality implies second-order belief. This paper is a critical discussion of Shoemaker's argument

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Shoemaker on second-order belief.Anthony Brueckner - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):361-64.
Do the self-deceived get what they want?Eric Funkhouser - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):295-312.
Seeing Through Self-Deception.Annette Barnes - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty on belief and self‐deception.Béla Szabados - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):464-473.
Self-deception.Ian Deweese-Boyd - 2023 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Self-deception and akratic belief: A rejoinder.Alfred R. Mele - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):201-206.
The product of self-deception.Neil Van Leeuwen - 2007 - Erkenntnis 67 (3):419 - 437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
70 (#238,333)

6 months
17 (#161,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Theory of Knowledge.Keith Lehrer - 1990 - Boulder, Colo.: Routledge.
Moore’s paradox and self-knowledge.Sydney Shoemaker - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):211-28.
The Varieties of Reference.McCulloch Gregory, Evans Gareth & McDowell John - 1984 - Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):515.

Add more references