Paskvil, nebo umění? Nový diletantismus jako zdroj unaveného publika [A Scribble or The Art? New Diletantisms as a Source of Tired Audience]

Espes 8 (2):37-46 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Education and the support for creativity are some of the functions of the new medias. The users utilize a lot of e-tools to create products with varying art quality. Because of this new ability to create they, fallaciously, consider themselves – from their new positions of becoming artists - having also become art critics but they fail to understand the complexity of creative process. We intend to exemplify with the art of the American painter Cy Twombly, that some works of art which seem to be easy to copy and therefore not worth enough are in fact a result of the author ́s erudition, talent, diligence and clear intention. Twombly ́s works are connected with topics such as sigh, ability to decipher, Apollonian and Dionysian principles and the dichotomy Eros/Thanatos. We will present the artist's original non-copiable way of taking inspiration from classical mytological stories and some interpretative approaches.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Art and the educated audience.James O. Young - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3):29-42.
Art and audience.Nick Zangwill - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):315-332.
The Furies in Choe._ and _Ag..William Whallon - 1995 - Classical Quarterly 45 (1):231-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-25

Downloads
24 (#662,338)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?