Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions

Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):67-92 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Biomedical engineering technologies such as brain–machine interfaces and neuroprosthetics are advancements which assist human beings in varied ways. There are exciting yet speculative visions of how the neurosciences and bioengineering may influence human nature. However, these could be preparing a possible pathway towards an enhanced and even posthuman future. This article seeks to investigate several ethical themes and wider questions of enhancement, transhumanism and posthumanism. Four themes of interest are: autonomy, identity, futures, and community. Three larger questions can be asked: will everyone be enhanced? Will we be “human” if we are not, one day, transhuman? Should we be enhanced or not? The article proceeds by concentrating on a widespread and sometimes controversial application: the cochlear implant, an auditory prosthesis implanted into Deaf patients. Cochlear implantation and its reception in both the deaf and hearing communities have a distinctive moral discourse, which can offer surprising insights. The paper begins with several points about the enhancement of human beings, transhumanism’s reach beyond the human, and posthuman aspirations. Next it focuses on cochlear implants on two sides. Firstly, a shorter consideration of what technologies may do to humans in a transhumanist world. Secondly, a deeper analysis of cochlear implantation’s unique socio-political movement, its ethical explanations and cultural experiences linked with pediatric cochlear implantation—and how those wary of being thrust towards posthumanism could marshal such ideas by analogy. As transhumanism approaches, the issues and questions merit continuing intense analysis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Posthumanism?Cary Wolfe - 2009 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
deconstruction and excision in philosophical posthumanism.David Roden - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):27 - 36.
Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.Rui Nunes - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (4):337-349.
A moral vision for transhumanism.Patrick D. Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 19 (1):3-7.
Choosing for the child with cochlear implants: a note of precaution. [REVIEW]Patrick Kermit - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (2):157-167.
Cochlear implants and the claims of culture? A response to Lane and Grodin.Dena S. Davis - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):253-258.
In defense of posthuman dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Posthumanism.Neil Badmington (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Palgrave.
Worlds of Difference.Marcel Broesterhuizen - 2008 - Ethical Perspectives 15 (1):103-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-11

Downloads
142 (#132,138)

6 months
15 (#171,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

In defense of posthuman dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement.Robert Sparrow - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):20-28.
Why I Want to be a Posthuman When I Grow Up.Nick Bostrom - 2013 - In Max More & Natasha Vita‐More (eds.), The Transhumanist Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 28-53.
Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants.Robert Sparrow - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (2):135–152.

View all 27 references / Add more references