Assessing the Pedagogical Goals of Self-Testing in Evaluating the Consultation Needs of Different Student Populations

&
American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):41-43 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 4, Page 41-43, April 2012

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2012.656815

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Personalized Genomic Educational Testing: What Do the Undergrads Think?Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):43-45.
Why Some Conflicts Involving “'Difficult' Patients” Should Remain Outside the Province of the Ethics Consultation Service.Cheryl Cline - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (5):16-18.
Significance testing in a bayesian framework: Assessing direction of effects.Henry Rouanet - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):217-218.
Lived Relationality as Fulcrum for Pedagogical–Ethical Practice.Tone Saevi - 2011 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (5):455-461.
Advocacy Through a Prism: A Response to Commentaries on “Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation”.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):W1 - W3.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Genetic testing for vulnerable populations: What kinds of communication we need and do not need.Dean Schillinger & Daniel Dohan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):12 – 14.
The Devil in the Details: Thorough Assessment of Evidence and Ethics Is Needed in Evaluating New HIV Prevention Methods.Liza Dawson - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (6):33-34.
The Complexities of Sport, Gender, and Drug Testing.Pam R. Sailors, Sarah J. Teetzel & Charlene Weaving - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):23 - 25.
Review of Marion Danis, Emily Largent, David Wendler, Sara Chandros Hull, Seema Shah, Joseph Millum, Benjamin Berkman, and Christine Grady, Research Ethics Consultation: A Casebook1. [REVIEW]Emily E. Anderson - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):54-55.
The goals of ethics consultation: Rejecting the role of "ethics police".Martin L. Smith & Kathryn L. Weise - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):42 – 44.
Parental authority, future autonomy, and assessing risks of predictive genetic testing in Minors.A. Boyce & P. Borry - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):379-385.
Quality Standards for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Alfred Simon - 2009 - Diametros 22:105 – 115.
Sport, Sex Segregation, and Sex Testing: Critical Reflections on This Unjust Marriage.Shari L. Dworkin & Cheryl Cooky - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):21 - 23.
Gender Transports: Privileging the “Natural” in Gender Testing Debates for Intersex and Transgender Athletes.Lance Wahlert & Autumn Fiester - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):19 - 21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-28

Downloads
24 (#660,486)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references